PreDisease.com Blog

Research which included 90,000 subjects from 13 different studies has shown that there is an increased risk of developing diabetes in people who use statins to combat high cholesterol. Although the risk is low (a 9% increase in the four-year risk of developing the disease), researchers also looked at the risk of suffering a heart attack or stroke and concluded that the benefits of taking statins outweigh the risk of developing diabetes. The risk of developing diabetes was highest in the studies that included older people. There was no difference in risk among the statins tested, which included Zocor, Crestor, Lipitor, Mevacor, and Pravachol.

The researchers concluded that physicians should be aware of this risk and, in addition to monitoring liver function and CK (creatinine kinase, which might indicate muscle damage if elevated), doctors should also check glucose levels periodically in their patients taking statins to reduce cholesterol. They also recommended that physicians should weigh the risk of developing diabetes in patients who have a lower risk of heart disease before prescribing statins. The study appears in The Lancet.

Pre-Lipid is an all-natural product designed to safely and effectively lower cholesterol using plant-based ingredients, without the side effects associated with the use of statins.

Source: Diabetes Risk of Statins Outweighed by Heart Benefit

The current guidelines for HRT (hormone replacement therapy) are that women take HRT for the shortest time and in the smallest dose possible to treat symptoms of menopause. Studies in the past suggested that taking HRT early on in menopause protected women from heart disease, but new data does not support this idea.

The Women’s Health Initiative was a huge study of 16,000 women, half of whom received HRT while the other half received placebos. The study was halted in 2002 when it was discovered that the women taking HRT had higher rates of blood clots, heart disease and breast cancer. It was this study that ignited the fierce debate about HRT therapy and its safety that has raged ever since.

Researchers recently turned their focus to the women in the study who began HRT early in menopause and discovered that there was a slight increase in risk of heart disease, although the numbers were not considered significant. The researchers debunked the theory that HRT taken early in menopause has a protective effect against heart disease. It should be noted that the women in the WHI study took higher doses of hormones than women typically use today.

Women should consider the risks and benefits of HRT and should discuss these factors with their personal physician. Many women are choosing to use lifestyle and natural remedies to cope with menopause symptoms.

PreMenora is a twice-daily all-natural formulation that decreases menopausal symptoms by 80% and provides immediate and long-term results. It is easily affordable and offers a safe alternative to HRT.

Source: Early HRT Doesn’t Reduce Heart Risk

NSAIDs are a class of drugs which inhibit prostaglandins. Prostoglandins are produced by cells in the body by the enzyme cyclooxygenase (COX). Prostoglandins produce inflammation, fever and pain. They also protect the stomach from damaging acid and assist in platelet function. There are 2 COX enzymes:  COX-1 promotes platelet function and protects the delicate stomach, while COX-2 does not afford as much stomach protection. NSAIDs that block COX-1 are more likely to cause stomach bleeding.

NSAIDs are used to treat a variety of conditions, including fever, headache, injuries, menstrual cramps and arthritis. They can be very effective at reducing fever and pain; however, long-term use does not come without risk. NSAIDs can often cause gastrointestinal upset (nausea, vomiting, stomach pain, constipation, loss of appetite). In addition, prolonged use may lead to live damage, prolonged bleeding, ulcers and gastrointestinal bleeding. They may also increase blood pressure in some individuals. People who take blood thinners, such as Coumadin (warfarin) should not take NSAIDs because of an increased risk of bleeding.

People with chronic conditions such as arthritis should be monitored by a physician if they are taking NSAIDs long-term to assess their risk for adverse events such as gastrointestinal bleeding and liver damage.

Source: Nonsteroidal Antiinflammatory Drugs (NSAIDs)

Statins are drugs that help to lower cholesterol in humans. They work by lowering an enzyme (HMG-CoA reductase) in the liver, the end result of which is the increased clearance of LDL (low-density lipoprotein) in the blood. When taken regularly, they start to work in approximately one week, with peak effect seen in 4 to 6 weeks. Drugs in this class include Pravachol, Crestor and Lipitor, to name a few.

Statins are widely prescribed to people with high cholesterol to decrease their risk of heart attack and stroke. However, their use is not without risk. There are several side effects attributed to statins, including:

• Muscle pain
• Liver damage
• Headache
• GI upset (nausea, vomiting, diarrhea)
• Rash
• Headache

By far, the most serious side effects of statins are liver damage and muscle pain, which may indicate rhabdomyolysis, a rare but deadly condition which results in muscle cell death and can lead to kidney failure. Persons who are taking statins should report muscle pain to their physician; as well, liver function should be assessed through blood tests periodically to ensure the liver is functioning normally.

Shoveling snow is one activity that is not for the faint of heart. Anyone older than the age of 50 who has heart disease and shovels snow may be at risk of suffering a heart attack. Studies have demonstrated that heart attack and sudden death rates increase following a blizzard.

Experts cite the following reasons why shoveling can be harmful to some. A shovel full of snow may weigh as much as 15 to 16 pounds. Men in good health who have been studied while shoveling snow are found to have equaled or surpassed the heart rates achieved through maximal exercise testing. Coupled with breathing cold air, which causes the heart’s blood vessels to constrict, this too-rapid heart rate can lead to a heart attack. In addition, people who are shoveling may not be aware that they are in trouble, as they are focused on the activity and not on related symptoms, such as shortness of breath or pain in the chest or jaw.

Anyone middle-aged or those with heart disease should not shovel snow, state experts. Instead, they encourage those at risk to find alternatives to shoveling the snow themselves, such as hiring a neighborhood teen to do the job.

Is Shoveling a Risk for Heart Attack? Yes

For the past year, the H1N1 virus has snared headlines, as fears of unprecedented infection rates and deaths due to the vaccine caused global concern. In the first real assessment of the impact of the disease, the CDC has released figures for the outbreak thus far in the United States:

• An estimated 57 million Americans have had the disease (this figure is mid-range and may be as high as 84 million)
• An estimated 183,000 to 378,000 Americans were hospitalized because of the illness
• An estimated 8,300 to 17,000 Americans may have died from H1N1
• Approximately 19 million cases occurred in those under the age of 18
• Approximately 33 million cases occurred in the age group 18 to 64
• Approximately 5 million cases occurred in those older than 64 years of age
• More  older people than children died from the illness; however, the age group hit hardest is the 18 to 64 year age group

Although the H1N1 flu would appear to be subsiding at the moment, the CDC urges caution and warns that upsurges in disease activity can still occur. At risk people, including those with lung disease, heart disease, and diabetes should still consider getting the vaccine if they have not already done so. The virus continues to cause illness, hospitalizations and death.

Source: 57 Million Americans Sickened by H1N1 Flu: CDC

People who suffer from migraines are almost twice as likely to suffer a heart attack, but the reason for the connection between the two is not clear, according to a new study appearing this month in Neurology online.

In one of the largest studies on the subject to date, 6,102 people with migraine and 5,243 without were compared; there was a 4.1% incidence of heart attack in the migraine group, versus 1.9% in the control group. In addition, it was discovered that those migraine sufferers who experienced aura were 3 times as likely to have a heart attack. Migraine sufferers were more likely to have risk factors for stroke, heart attack and other cardiovascular disease, such as diabetes, hypertension and high cholesterol.

Researchers concluded that people who suffer migraines are at higher risk for heart attack for unknown reasons, and that these people need to be extra vigilant about controlling what risk factors they can. Controlling weight, cholesterol and blood pressure may be even more important for migraine sufferers than the general population. Migraine sufferers are more often young women, and their physicians should be aware of this link, intervening early to prevent heart disease and stroke.

Source: Migraine Linked to Increased Heart Attack Risk

Could a blood test for rheumatoid arthritis predict who will develop the debilitating disorder? A new study points to this possibility. The secret to prediction lies in cytokines, according to researchers.

Researchers studied blood samples from 86 individuals who did not yet have rheumatoid arthritis and compared these samples to 256 matched controls. The researchers were measuring 30 different cytokines and cytokine-related factors. The results? Those people who later went on to develop rheumatoid arthritis had elevated levels of cytokines; furthermore, the patterns of these elevations distinguished them from members of the control group.

What does this mean? The results show that it may be possible to predict with accuracy who will develop rheumatoid arthritis. Being able to identify individuals at risk of developing the disease will allow earlier diagnosis of the condition and may even allow for prevention of this debilitating disease. At present, rheumatoid arthritis can be difficult to diagnose, and persons with the disease may not be treated until the disease is advanced. Knowing earlier will permit aggressive treatment of the disease, before severe joint damage occurs.

Source: Can Blood Samples Predict Arthritic Rheumatism?

Soft drink giants Pepsi and Coke are climbing aboard the fight against obesity by moving forward with plans to include new labeling on their containers that will show the calorie content of their respective products on the front of their containers.

Following the initiative of some food industry giants to be seen as more accountable to the public, several soft drink manufacturers climbed aboard the anti-obesity train by pledging their willingness to change the labeling of their products in order to help fight against the growing obesity epidemic. A number of companies in recent years have opted to change their products by offering healthier alternatives and making their labeling more clear in terms of content that is deemed unhealthy. Fast food restaurants in several states now list calorie and fat content of items on their menu.

Now it is the soft drink industry’s turn. Pepsi and Coke, along with others, have pledged to make their labeling changes by 2012. In addition, they have released plans to limit portion sizes and offer more low-cal choices, a move that can only be seen in a positive light and will no doubt be appreciated by those who are trying to be more conscientious regarding their food choices.

A new study shows that changing three behaviors that are common to many American families can reduce childhood obesity by 40%. What are these behaviors?

Ensuring an adequate night’s sleep– children in the study who got at least 10 ½ hours of sleep per night were less likely to be obese. The reason? Children who are well rested most likely are less tired during the day, and therefore more apt to engage in activities that are healthy.

Eating together as a family– the study found that children who enjoy meals with their family more than 5 times a week were less likely to become obese. They postulate that eating at the family dinner table, instead of in front of the television, teaches children good eating habits, such as regulation of food intake. These children may be less likely to eat mindlessly and may be more aware of what and how much they are eating.

Moderating the amount of television watched– children who watch less than 2 hours of television per day are less likely to be obese. The reasoning is obvious- these childen are more likely to be engaged in active play, rather than sitting still and watching television.

The effects of each of these three behaviors was independent, meaning that there was a cumulative effect with each behavior that was added. According to the study, only one in seven children who practiced all three behaviors were obese, in comparison to one in four children who did not practice any of the behaviors.

Source: How to fight childhood obesity in 3 steps